comparison of modern rear wings – F1 vs. LM

For given reasons, namely finishing the Audi’s rear wing, I’ll do a little comparison between modern (2011) F1 (Red Bull RB7) and LM (Audi R18 TDI) rear wings.

In generally you can say, that F1 is much more (very much more) regulated than Le Mans cars. Only if we take a look on the tech regulations, you can see the enormous difference. On the one hand the F1 tech regs with 74 pages and on the other hand the LM tech regs with 52 pages each with English and French text. So in reality we have the F1 regs with 74 pages and the LM regs with 26 pages!

Also the notation is quite different. In the F1 regs you won’t find the word rear wing or end plate. There you can interpret the “bodywork behind the rear wheel centre line” (Article 3.10) or “width behind the rear wheel centre line” (Article 3.5) against the LM regulations where you can literally read the regs for “Rear wing” (Article 3.6.3) in point “3.6 – Aerodynamic devices”.

saca

Rear view of the two cars (Red Bull RB7 and Audi R18 TDI). Even here you can see the enormous difference between the dimensions of these two wings. The Red Bulls wing is in Monza configuration, the Audis wing is in Le Mans configuration. So, both cars drive with very low downforce.

asef

Here’s a nine pic to compare these two wing types visibly.

sae

The wings projected area viewed from above is about 245.000mm² for the RB7 and 240.000mm² for the R18 TDI. You can see, even if the F1 wing has not half the width of the LM wing, they have both about the same surface.

df

Current F1 rear wing elements are quite similar to LM wing elements. A few more small details, but not really different. The cross section of the wing elements is a bit thinner and not that much like a standard wing section like it is at LM cars.

sadfe

Even a LM car is 80mm higher than a F1 car, the rear wings are allowed to be at almost the same height. 950mm at F1 cars and 965mm at LM cars (although Audi does not exploit the full height).

aser

At the end plates, you can see a really big difference. Where the LM end plates are really only there for closing the wing, the F1 end plates have great aerodynamical influence on the cars rear end. I’m no aerodynamicist and I won’t strike out trying to explain this circumstance, but I think it’s clearly visible, that the EP’s function is not only there to closing off the wing.

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

About paulsf1

My name is Paul Bischof. I’m a student in mechanical engineering at the Technical University of Graz in Austria, expected finishing in February 2016. Since I was eight years old, I am building model planes out of paperboard. Since 2004 I scratch (that means building without an assembling set) Formula 1 and sportscars in 1:10th scale. The average time I need for such a car is around 400 to 700 hours within 4 to 8 months. One car has around 3500 up to 5000 single components. On this blog, you can take a look on my work and later, after my studies, hopefully you can see me in Formula 1.

One response to “comparison of modern rear wings – F1 vs. LM”

  1. SuperSwede says :

    Great detailed comparison pics.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: